THIS DESERVES A BLOG OF ITS OWN AND HERE IT IS

http://scotusatcb.blogspot.com/

SHOW ME ANY OTHER SECURITIES CASE WHERE COURTS MADE ARGUMENTS LIKE THE COURTS BELOW THE TOP CRAP DID IN MINE. NO MATTER HOW YOU DESCRIBE THEM AS WEAK YOU WOULD STILL FEEL SOMETHING MISSING BECAUSE THEY WERE ALMOST LIKE WHEN SOMEONE SARCASTICALLY MOCKS ANOTHER PERSON BY PRETENDING INABILITY TO UNDERSTAND CLEAR THINGS HE IS SAYING.

JUST TO REFRESH THE MEMORY OF ANYONE WHO HAS FORGOTTEN HERE IS THE LINK TO MY PETITION TO THE SUPREME CRAP AGAIN:

THE PETITION I SUBMITTED TO THE SUPREME CRAP

I VERY MUCH  ENCOURAGE ANYONE WHO THINKS HE CAN SUCCESSFULLY ARGUE FOR AND DEFEND THE SUPREME CRAP IN DENYING MY PETITION TO DO SO BY CLICKING THE COMMENTS LINK (WHICH WHEN THERE IS NO COMMENTS APPEARS AS "No comments"). IF SUCCESSFUL YOU WOULD AT LEAST RE INSTALL SOME FAITH IN THE SYSTEM BACK IN ME WHICH IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN THE RESULT OF ONE CASE REGARDLESS OF HOW MUCH IT MATTER TO ME     

REMEMBER HOW I SPOKE ABOUT THIS GUY TAKING THOSE WITH HIM MUCH FURTHER THAN WHAT THEY INITIALLY INTENDED TO GO AND ULTIMATELY DO THINGS HIS WAY? HERE IS ANOTHER EXAMPLE. HIS ACTIONS WERE PROBABLY FOR SHOWING WILLINGNESS TO SETTLE TO THOSE ON HIS SIDE AT A LEVEL MUCH HIGHER THAN HE IS REALLY WILLING TO GO. AND EVEN FOR THE LOWER LEVEL THAT PROBABLY SHOULD STILL HAVE COME WITH HIM ACTING FROM A HIGHER POSITION REFUSING TO ACKNOWLEDGE REALITY AS IF TREATING THE OPPOSING PARTY SARCASTICALLY.

ANYWAY, THAT IS IN NO WAY AS IMPORTANT AS THE SUPREME CRAP SHOWING HOW CORRUPT IT IS.

AND BELIEVE IT OR NOT THE CORRUPTION GUY DID NOT EVEN BOTHER HIMSELF TO OFFER ANY SETTLEMENT. HE JUST KEPT ACTING IN AN INSULTING WAY BY LEAVING VOICE MAIL MESSAGES THE FIRST OF WHICH SOUNDED LIKE RECORDED UNCLEAR GENERAL MESSAGE FROM A NUMBER TO WHICH I DECIDED NOT TO CHECK ITS MESSAGES AGAIN AFTER I SAW OTHER   PEOPLE COMPLAINING ABOUT IT CALLING THEM ON THE INTERNET WHICH WAS SOMETHING HE PROBABLY KNEW I WOULD DO.    

I NEVER FELT I HAVE NO RIGHTS LIKE I THE WAY I AM FEELING NOW.

EVEN FOR ME IT IS NOT JUST ABOUT THIS CASE OF MINE BUT ALSO ABOUT HOW WHAT HAPPENED HERE MEANS THAT THE LIKE OF THE CORRUPTION GUY HERE CAN DO WHATEVER THEY WANT TO ME AND I WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO DO ANYTHING TO THEM. IT IS LIKE YOU DON'T EXIST AND DO NOT OWN ANYTHING. NOT EVEN THE WILD WEST IN THE WILDEST IMAGINATION CONTAIN THIS LEVEL OF MESS.

EVEN IF YOU WANT TO IGNORE MY RIGHTS AS A ONE PERSON, HOW CAN YOU IGNORE THE ENTIRE JUDICIAL SYSTEM ALLOWING SUCH THINGS TO HAPPEN IN IT? WHAT SIGNAL YOU ARE GIVING ABOUT THE INTEGRITY OF THE SYSTEM WHEN YOU ALLOW SUCH CLEARLY REPREHENSIBLE ACTIONS TO HAPPEN? COULD THINGS BE ANY MORE CLEAR FOR YOU TO PUT YOUR FEET DOWN AND AGAINST THE CORRUPTION AND ABUSE OF THE SYSTEM?

THIS LEVEL OF CLEAR INJUSTICE CAN BE ALLOWED TO HAPPEN ONLY IN THE CRAPPIEST NATIONS ON EARTH.

THE OUTRAGEOUSNESS OF THE ACTIONS FROM THE COURTS BELOW THE TOP CRAP WAS SO OBVIOUS THAT I FELT WHEN ARGUING TO POINT THEM OUT AS IF I AM EXPLAINING SOMETHING AS BASIC AS HEARING OR SEEING SOMETHING.  

I CALL THEM CRAP BUT IF CRAP CAN TALK IT WOULD HAVE COMPLAINED SAYING "WHAT HAVE I DONE TO YOU TO CALL ME THAT?". IF TALKING TO CRAP SOUNDS INSULTING TO ME IT IS STILL A FACT BECAUSE, AGAIN, I NOT ONLY TALKED TO A SUPREME CRAP BUT HAD TO PUT ENORMOUS EFFORT SATISFYING ITS TECHNICAL REQUIREMENT JUST TO ACCESS IT. 

IT IS HARD TO IMAGINE THAT A PERSON WITH EVEN ANY RESPECTABLE AMOUNT OF HONOR OR HONESTY ON THIS EARTH WOULD HAVE LOOKED AT MY CASE AND WOULDN'T DECIDE TO USE WHATEVER POWER HE HAS TO PUNISH THE LOWER COURTS FOR THEIR ACTIONS HERE LET ALONE PASSING ON IT.

ALTHOUGH THE CRAPPY JUDICIAL SYSTEM LEFT ME WITH ONLY A COURT WITH A DISCRETIONARY POWER IN TAKING CASES AS A LAST RESORT TO CORRECT ALL THE THINGS THAT HAPPENED FROM THE COURTS BELOW, THEY STILL SHOULDN'T HAVE REFUSED MY CASE EVEN IF THEY ACCEPTED FOR THEMSELVES TO ACT LIKE CRAP BECAUSE DOING SO FOR A CASE WITH THIS LEVEL OF THE OUTRAGEOUS AND REPREHENSIBLE THINGS DONE BY THE LOWER COURTS WOULD NOT FIT THE "GOOD BEHAVIOR" REQUIREMENT ON THE JUDICIARY IN THE CONSTITUTION.  

IN ADDITION TO WHAT WAS WRITTEN IN ITS RULES, YOU SEE ONE OF THOSE WORKING FOR THE SUPREME CRAP SPEAKING ABOUT THE IMPORTANCE OF COMING TO THEM. I CAME WITH A CASE CONTAINING THE MOST OUTRAGEOUS THINGS FROM THE LOWER COURTS AND LOOK WHAT HAPPENED. THE CHIEF OF THE CRAP - I AM SORRY- THE SUPREME CRAP IN ANOTHER VIDEO SPEAKS ABOUT HOW THEY NEED TO BE CONVINCING IN THEIR OPINIONS. OK, TRY TO EXPLAIN THE DENIAL TO MY PETITION.    

AN HONEST READER CANNOT EVEN AVOID THE IMPRESSION THAT I WAS NOT TAKEN SERIOUSLY BY THE LOWER COURTS.

WHAT? THE REPREHENSIBILITY OF THE ACTIONS OF THE LOWER COURTS WAS NOT ENOUGH FOR THE SUPREME CRAP? READ THE OPINION OF THE APPELLATE CRAP. IT NOT ONLY CONTRADICTS AN ENDLESS LIST OF OTHER APPELLATE COURTS BUT ALSO CONTRADICT THE MOST BASIC SIMPLE THINKING AND RECOGNITION. MUCH OF IT WAS A DIRECT DENIAL AS IF YOU ARE TALKING TO SOMEONE WHO CANT HEAR.

THE NUMBER IS 14-1099 IN CASE ANY ONE WANTS TO CHECK THAT HIMSELF ON THE SUPREME CRAP WEB SITE. 

SORRY, BUT A CRAP CAN HARDLY SMELL WORSE THAN THIS.

THIS COULD HAVE HAPPENED TO ME IN NORTH KOREA AND I WOULD STILL USE IT TO POINT OUT THE LEVEL OF CORRUPTION OF ITS JUDICIARY. 

I REACHED THE FINAL END AND HEREBY COMPLETED MY PROOF FOR THE CRAPNESS OF THE WHOLE JUDICIARY.  

I CHALLENGE  ALL THOSE AT THE SUPREME CRAP TO EXPLAIN WHY MY PETITION WAS DENIED.

Can anybody explain why my petition was denied?
What happened to me with the courts below was not enough for the one at the top to apply its supervisory role? 
It was not even sent back for correction but simply just denied. 

My petition was DENIED

My petition was DENIED

This LINK shows how the corruption guy disabled my search on the Supreme Court Web Site from my laptop PC. Look at how the same searches find results in my Chromebook (Of course it would have been more difficult to find a similar proof had he disabled my search from my internet provider (Charter) but he did not choose this path this time).