+85

Personally, my only complaint about the games being played is that they are not good enough for enjoyment. However, morally, I cannot just sit and enjoy watching the system being degraded and therefore I denounce that like I denounced crossing into the right of others before.     

+84

Continuing from the preceding post

Yes, at the base stage of knowledge I did not take the denial of my petition easily. But, beyond that, even at the stage of just adding knowing that there is also a claim of intent to deal with my case in a good way externally, regardless of the level of existing support for that claim, I was not tested.  

+83

Clearly I am not supposed to know if I am being played. But if I am, for whatever belongs to the court, are those people for real? I had a 1000 pound weight dropped on me out of the blue with the denial of my petition. Now, if anything, I have weightless feathers, and despite how I waived any right I could have if untrue claims came from them, including indirect (through action) claims. I declared publicly that, for any possible effect on my side, those claims would be equivalent to being part of a game, which  I entered willingly, allowing the making of untrue claims.

Again, the denial of a petition is in a universe of its own because it signals to you that the process has ended and therefore it is evaluation time, no matter how much you had determination not to prejudge the end.