If you look at the listing of judges on the court website you would see that those who issued that ruling opinion (which I just found yesterday that its "per curiam" instead of naming the authoring judge means "by the court") were listed next to each other. If this arrangement was modified for that purpose then it clearly adds to the corruption here. On the other hand, if that listing is original then it is even much bigger corruption sign because it would emphasize that no special judge selection was done here and this level of immoral ruling and denial of clear facts in that opinion was more of a common position. In other words, one could say that opinion was so corrupt it makes the lack of corruption in selecting judges who are more on the hedge fund guy side shows more corruption instead of less.
No comments:
Post a Comment