Notice that although I said " the path of injury to shareholders started with the dilution to shareholders ownership .." that assumption for the existence of such path by default is not necessary. I could have written " If there was an injury to the corporation because of the low price shares were issue at then the path of injury.." and still reached the same result. That is because the "If " part would not mean that the injury to the corporation created the path to shareholders injury. Instead, it would simply just tell us that a path to shareholders injury was started with the issuance of those shares because that issuance was not justified by sufficient benefit for the corporation.
No comments:
Post a Comment