+104

Too much energy and resources could be wasted when parties unnecessarily engage themselves worrying about each other instead of assuming the correctness of the work of each party toward itself. Therefore from now on, I intend to focus better on my thoughts and what I want to do by better resisting the feeling of guilt related to hardships on those judges like that resulting from the absent judge claim or any other thing with which they could be burdening themselves in relation to any  effect on me despite what I have written (although that is still much more about my guilt feeling toward the persons not the effect on their work as the final judicial point for justice). If this is what I do here imagine what I would have done if I were in their place, and aside from everything else, if I have that huge guilt this court has with the Second Amendment.   

+103

It seems that the effect of the denial of my petition on me is still being compared to other things in terms of intensity and much less the way I wanted to express it as a different kind of action. So lets make a little review. I did not continue to the final court depending on a faith I had for positive reaction there. Actually, I looked at what to me was the absence of caring signs from this guy and the whole environment in general and said to my self lets see to what this will lead. In doing so I looked at things as being entirely within the  domain of formal process. Like any other litigant the denial of my petition was seen as a fatal thing because it closes that domain. However, after that denial I got what made me consider the existence of a surviving personal involvement to solve the matter domain by the judges at the final court. So  unless you find a way to also close this domain (and I do not know how you can do that) I am very far from being affected even close to the way that happened with the denial of my petition regardless of the intensity level of what I see.