+21

continuing from post +2
My aim here was simply to reflect the guy's game back onto him.

+20

continuing from post +14

Of course me being treated externally like an object fits him positioning himself like God is not something that is hard to fit with his behaviour of watching me beyond any boundary and the world he creates around me with his wide scale conspiracy games.

+19

I don't want to dwell too long on that case yet but having the judge herself, in the earlier order, points out the, unsolicited, legal advice given to me instead of ruling on my motion to replace the deficient summonses sounds like a scene from a comedy movie. 

+18

Apparently, despite everything it did, the district court of Florida was relatively the classy one. With the one in New York it is like I am dealing with thugs. I had to go after or push everything at the technical level from the very start of sending the complaint as if trying to make a thief honestly abide itself by the duty of its work to send and receive things.     

With the summonses, even if I want to ignore all other objections, it doesn't even make sense to serve a summon not addressed to any body. But apparently for this case his majesty the corruption guy decided to stop things form the court itself at this level.

By the way, I don't know if this is also part of the corruption but they did not even photocopy the complaint correctly. Apparently, having signed all the copies I sent them instead of just one messed up this court with the dedicated special unit all pro se litigants have to go through.  

+17

I then sent back an affidavit about the new summonses in support of the motion I had filed earlier for replacement of the first summonses they sent.

To my surprise, unlike the motion and the affidavit that followed it regarding the first summonses (which I had to send twice because,for some reason the reception of the first identical one did not count), this one was entered as affidavit not a letter. I guess the federal district court defriended me.  

+16

I did not mention this but on April 11 the district court in New York issued an order requiring me to serve the defendants in my Viking Systems case by May 9, 2016. A little later I received a notice about a certified package containing the summonses. This time I video recorded the opening of the envelope and showed how the new summonses are exactly the same as the old ones. I actually recorded that from three different angles simultaneously.

+15

Clearly, to some level, I decided to work through this thing of being treated externally like an object. However, I still worry sometimes that it could have been applied to the level that when I say I am not much affected by the passing of time I am not doing at least a neutral thing to those inside the court if they want to end the case in terms not favorable to this guy but a bad thing. 

+14

This guy may think it can pass without being noticed, but it is not hard seeing how the situation fits him positioning himself as God with things being external to me and his actions should not be foreseeable by me because of being obligations he has to do.

+13

Contrary to how it may suggest otherwise, the more I explain and convey what I see the more I am completing my execution for returning back what I returned to the judges of the court, not cancel or run away from that.   

In addition, even if it is believed that I shouldn't need to explain or write anything I don't mind doing it and I am not holding anyone in the court morally responsible for that.

+12

And what a unity it was. The guy was not even required to refrain from his dirt low demeaningly dehumanizing ways and taking the dignity of the other person as a joke like that. Instead he gets submitting servers who were acting as if they were inviting  me to join them in worshiping him as a God.   

+11

And if you think it takes some special level of being shameless to continue standing with this guy despite the level of clarity in my offer  to him about what could follow, for many their warnings about this guy and his behaviour go back to 2010. It goes back to all what I wrote about him in the Viking Systems Stock's situation, even before he got into this stock and what followed with the courts. 

Anyway, with or without that, it would have been an entirely different thing had my offer to him been a private one and those in his support knew about it only after it passed. But it was a public one and those with him knew about it in real time. So as much as that level of unconditional support reflects oneness as much as a person may wonder about the sufficiency of the offer for such unity. 

+10

The more I remember his behaviour in response to the price jump which led to that Viking Systems stock situation the more I remember how much I wouldn't have guessed that he was not in trouble because of it in a million years. 

+9

 continuing from the preceding post

There I felt a struggle in order to look beyond what was on the forefront and see the reason behind the behaviour of this corruption guy as a control issue instead of being simply materially motivated like any other material motivation. I kept stating that he could have "tolerated" what happened there for what I much later came to find out was less than a dimple to him financially. Seeing what he had done there, who would have thought corruption had reached the level  of making the system that much unaccounted for to this guy's wants and desires?