+102

It is very discomforting for me to see the final point for people to complain about injustice they suffer in such a huge country and with this limited number of intermediate stages gets even a little bit consumed by the game this corruption guy brought to it. What helps me tolerate this is the hope that I can minimize the amount of energy and resources diverted to this there and make dealing with the situation more convenient by conveying how much I am personally at ease here . Therefore it is very important to me that I get believed in that I am conveying reality instead of being seen as a good guy making a sacrifice. Actually the more I feel believed in conveying that reality the more I feel free to do what I want to do instead of sacrificing the time. I don't need to be already entangled or for anyone to push me in order to fall in a situation like this. The corruption guy has pushed this to be something that I would not only willingly choose to throw my self in it but also search exhaustingly in order to do so. It is saying otherwise what would have been the hard thing to fit my track record in the stock market where it is not even close to being a realistic goal to seek a similar situation. One may imagine this mentioned there as someone sees another person not being content to invest with anybody and says mockingly to the latter that he can do that with the judges running the final court.  

+101

When my petition was denied I intentionally and even beyond my rage kept insulting the judges of the final court taking pride in that despite my lose at least I am reacting to the highest court like the ones below if not worse. Even assuming that later I would have been able to reach thoughts about the intention inside the court leading me to change direction without dependence on feeling as if this guy was being pushed from inside the court to contact me, I, for the standard of behaviour described above, still like being empowered to detect the court itself putting such effort more than the other way around and regardless of how much the latter could be better for me.   

+100

My situation here couldn't be easier or more fitting for me but for two things. The first is how to communicate this easiness and almost all of my worry is about others missing that. The second thing is the question of how much I was diverted away from the right path with my reactions to the manipulation of the system by this guy and my passivity toward giving the system the degraded appearance of his games.    

+99

Continuing from the preceding post:

They wrote a line about booklet format in that letter similar to the one I received in my first filing with the preceding case when I filed with letter size papers because I did not recognize that the booklet format applies to me until very late. These on the other hand are already in booklet format with difference from the required size, if any, more likely to be in millimeters. Is it possible to avoid thinking about a purpose here to have fun on tasking me with the remaking of those booklets and see me involve myself in exaggerated measuring to do that?     

+98

continuing from the preceding post

HERE is a link (first page only) to the letter I received from the Clerk Office of the U.S. Supreme Court. Rule 14 mentioned that the Clerk could return a letter "indicating the deficiency". The letter I received is far from fulfilling that and if I take everything there to be intended as a deficiency then it is a shameless lie and suggestion of what is hardly avoidable as being intended for other than falsehood. Also, the thing about how page numbering should start with i, ii, iii etc. followed by 1,2,3 etc. or even that there should be the separate numbering mentioned there in general, I do not know of any base for such a thing in the rules to begin with. Even had they returned all 40 copies and everything else back to me I still wouldn't have cared much about complying with a joke like this.     

+97

Today I found that my new petition to the final court was returned to me with a letter that plays on confusing listing individual objections with listing requirements. It then required me to correct the petition . I may come back to this later but for now I just want to ask this: Was this part of the original game plan made by this guy or is it that he altered it after seeing that, beyond making sure it was delivered, I did not check on the status of the petition, and therefore tried to compensate for expected failure there with directing me like I am a toy of his, again? Instead of just showing me things, this guy always play his games showing lack of caring not to cross the line to directly affect me personally. Moreover, while he may pretend such things to be just leading to other purpose, I feel confident that they are his real purpose and that he is very far from really expecting a result for what is supposedly his intention. But, seeing others of his type, I also know how much seeing his behaviour, which he tries to support, again like others of his kind, by creating divisions and isolation to prevent communications, could make one so far from expecting how much what this guy knows suggest otherwise to his behaviour and that he is toying with reality instead of really trying things, at least toward the direction he claim expecting effect for his effort.The minuet someone comes and ask for, not just joining him against the other party, but also externalizing that party you may need to think about the probability of underlying psychosis.               
The difference in time from receiving the petition on July 21 to the date of august 3 stated on the letter, fits the explanation suggested above.      

+96

Here comes the technical work of filing a new case petition to the final court. Goodbye free time! I am willing to pay for it to be prepared outside but whom can I trust on this with this guy?

+95

Despite how much I like, in the market, to invest with persons with little information known about them and go do what I want to do, this thing here was converted to the like of that except that this one is with persons chosen for and are running the final court. Imagine that. 

+93

Continuing from post +91

I just want to know, isn't there enough on the plate of people serving as the final judges of a huge country like this, to add the restriction of this absent judge claim on their work? If the intention of continuing it is to remedy the absence of knowing a specific date like that a case being officially with the court would have, then although I appreciate such level of caring and holding the self accountable very much, I am very far from being in need for that any longer, if at all. Having a specific date does not create a good judge but a good judge creates a specific date and frankly  speaking, to begin with, I would choose the sign contained in the denial of my petition and the surrounding situation over having a known specific date, any day of the year. As for the package that sign came in, dealing with it is part of the end result of this process and therefore does not need to be counted twice. That is just one of the reasons why I am very far from needing this absent judge situation. And it comes on top of that, because this is the final court, I, like any other person here, already have no choice but to risk depending on it in so many other things in our lives with the potential of going or being taken to it.

+92

I think that this situation could be a torture to Justice Scalia and even not because of his Heller opinion.

+91

Anyone thinks it is believable that the final court has been left with only eight judges for even a small fraction of this time is severely deluding himself. Therefore there is no reason for this continued additional hardship on the allegedly absent judge and on the work of the court because of that. I could hear similar news about the absence of all the judges then see that contradicted directly and still would not care to comment anything about the matter. What benefit does the corruption guy gets from the continuity of this situation? At least when it stops he can counter any thought of associating that with resolving my issue. 

+90

Yesterday, I thought about this analogy with the passing of time on me here. Imagine that a person needed or was required to stay in some place. But that person also happened to have his top priority is to read a book he was carrying with him, a thing he has not done of it anywhere close to be bored. Later people started to think that person have become bored with that place although he was still merely at the stage of preparing a seat for himself to sit comfortably to read his book. That place in this analogy is my situation here. The seat is the posts I make here trying to get rid of what could cause me to worry about whatever pressure the appearance of my situation could put on the work of the court and on the people there. Finally, you guessed it, the book is my thoughts about the personal matter to which I referred earlier. 

+89

Continuing from the preceding post

And remember that, unlike how it is with the roots, the judges did not share with this guy much of the way with which he processed the dealing with the matter which made things much worse (Even within this view the story of that offer is another matter). I also said that within the returning back of power to the judges of this court, if I was given the power I thought I could be given, they can decide if settlement here should also settle the New York case.

In the preceding post I wanted to express a real significance of that issue to me and how it maybe the one with clearly more priority but it was not my intention to show unappreciation for efforts done for my direction.

  

+88

I interrupt my talk about how the passing of time should not put pressure on the judges, to talk about a thing I hope to be considered carefully. As much as any, lets use the word "settlement", would be about my cases with the courts, it clearly involves two parties on that other side and not just the corruption guy. So why wouldn't the judges of this court use the power that was returned back to them and cancel half of my settlement offer amount to the corruption guy in order not to be obliged to the latter for paying for the judges part in what happened? Why would a person, let alone a judge, choose not to avoid reducing being obliged and having a relationship with an immoral defrauding to people guy like this?         

+87

Even if I want, for my right, time to start counting I would write something as equivalent to that effect as "I want to start counting the time" and that would be my total reaction to the passing of time here.

+86

Things could be already confusing with two blogs talking about the issue (FinalAndOtherCourts and this one) so I continue from THIS and some of its preceding posts.

Even if I want, for my right, time to start counting I could simply write saying "okay guys I want to start counting the time here", then except for the reference there this passing time would be as if it did not occur.

+85

Personally, my only complaint about the games being played is that they are not good enough for enjoyment. However, morally, I cannot just sit and enjoy watching the system being degraded and therefore I denounce that like I denounced crossing into the right of others before.     

+84

Continuing from the preceding post

Yes, at the base stage of knowledge I did not take the denial of my petition easily. But, beyond that, even at the stage of just adding knowing that there is also a claim of intent to deal with my case in a good way externally, regardless of the level of existing support for that claim, I was not tested.  

+83

Clearly I am not supposed to know if I am being played. But if I am, for whatever belongs to the court, are those people for real? I had a 1000 pound weight dropped on me out of the blue with the denial of my petition. Now, if anything, I have weightless feathers, and despite how I waived any right I could have if untrue claims came from them, including indirect (through action) claims. I declared publicly that, for any possible effect on my side, those claims would be equivalent to being part of a game, which  I entered willingly, allowing the making of untrue claims.

Again, the denial of a petition is in a universe of its own because it signals to you that the process has ended and therefore it is evaluation time, no matter how much you had determination not to prejudge the end.