+93

Continuing from post +91

I just want to know, isn't there enough on the plate of people serving as the final judges of a huge country like this, to add the restriction of this absent judge claim on their work? If the intention of continuing it is to remedy the absence of knowing a specific date like that a case being officially with the court would have, then although I appreciate such level of caring and holding the self accountable very much, I am very far from being in need for that any longer, if at all. Having a specific date does not create a good judge but a good judge creates a specific date and frankly  speaking, to begin with, I would choose the sign contained in the denial of my petition and the surrounding situation over having a known specific date, any day of the year. As for the package that sign came in, dealing with it is part of the end result of this process and therefore does not need to be counted twice. That is just one of the reasons why I am very far from needing this absent judge situation. And it comes on top of that, because this is the final court, I, like any other person here, already have no choice but to risk depending on it in so many other things in our lives with the potential of going or being taken to it.

+92

I think that this situation could be a torture to Justice Scalia and even not because of his Heller opinion.

+91

Anyone thinks it is believable that the final court has been left with only eight judges for even a small fraction of this time is severely deluding himself. Therefore there is no reason for this continued additional hardship on the allegedly absent judge and on the work of the court because of that. I could hear similar news about the absence of all the judges then see that contradicted directly and still would not care to comment anything about the matter. What benefit does the corruption guy gets from the continuity of this situation? At least when it stops he can counter any thought of associating that with resolving my issue. 

+90

Yesterday, I thought about this analogy with the passing of time on me here. Imagine that a person needed or was required to stay in some place. But that person also happened to have his top priority is to read a book he was carrying with him, a thing he has not done of it anywhere close to be bored. Later people started to think that person have become bored with that place although he was still merely at the stage of preparing a seat for himself to sit comfortably to read his book. That place in this analogy is my situation here. The seat is the posts I make here trying to get rid of what could cause me to worry about whatever pressure the appearance of my situation could put on the work of the court and on the people there. Finally, you guessed it, the book is my thoughts about the personal matter to which I referred earlier. 

+89

Continuing from the preceding post

And remember that, unlike how it is with the roots, the judges did not share with this guy much of the way with which he processed the dealing with the matter which made things much worse (Even within this view the story of that offer is another matter). I also said that within the returning back of power to the judges of this court, if I was given the power I thought I could be given, they can decide if settlement here should also settle the New York case.

In the preceding post I wanted to express a real significance of that issue to me and how it maybe the one with clearly more priority but it was not my intention to show unappreciation for efforts done for my direction.

  

+88

I interrupt my talk about how the passing of time should not put pressure on the judges, to talk about a thing I hope to be considered carefully. As much as any, lets use the word "settlement", would be about my cases with the courts, it clearly involves two parties on that other side and not just the corruption guy. So why wouldn't the judges of this court use the power that was returned back to them and cancel half of my settlement offer amount to the corruption guy in order not to be obliged to the latter for paying for the judges part in what happened? Why would a person, let alone a judge, choose not to avoid reducing being obliged and having a relationship with an immoral defrauding to people guy like this?         

+87

Even if I want, for my right, time to start counting I would write something as equivalent to that effect as "I want to start counting the time" and that would be my total reaction to the passing of time here.

+86

Things could be already confusing with two blogs talking about the issue (FinalAndOtherCourts and this one) so I continue from THIS and some of its preceding posts.

Even if I want, for my right, time to start counting I could simply write saying "okay guys I want to start counting the time here", then except for the reference there this passing time would be as if it did not occur.