I interrupt my talk about how the passing of time should not put pressure on the judges, to talk about a thing I hope to be considered carefully. As much as any, lets use the word "settlement", would be about my cases with the courts, it clearly involves two parties on that other side and not just the corruption guy. So why wouldn't the judges of this court use the power that was returned back to them and cancel half of my settlement offer amount to the corruption guy in order not to be obliged to the latter for paying for the judges part in what happened? Why would a person, let alone a judge, choose not to avoid reducing being obliged and having a relationship with an immoral defrauding to people guy like this?
No comments:
Post a Comment