Thursday, March 12, 2015

"no change to the substance" -2

After reading this I even left almost all of the misspellings the way they are. I still don't understand the reason behind this requirement. On the other hand I think that I now can see the intended purpose behind the difficult filing requirements the court imposes. It seems that these requirements were intentionally made difficult as a test if the filer's believe in his case is at least at level to make him put the effort to pass this test and not just fishing. Otherwise, the job those making these requirements are holding  most probably put them in clearly inconvenient situations more than the like of reading a text from a letter size document instead of the size they require.

No comments:

Post a Comment