I don't know on what basis it was not entered as a motion . But why would they start needing that now? They held my complaint for over two weeks and could have held it longer ,as well as this motion, hadn't I started talking about their action, without any justification.
If they tried to use the affirmation or affidavit requirement as an excuse then they probably misinterpreted that because such thing is assumed required when there is a dispute or expected dispute about the matter not when you are referring to something coming from the court itself. You don't see a motion written related to a court order include an affidavit or an affirmation about what the court order was. If whoever sent me those unusable summons from that court want to contest my claim then it may become my turn to supply an affirmation or affidavit.
Every filing to the court should go to the same place and from there they can pre process it through a pro se intake unite or through whatever they want and the pro se litigant shouldn't be used as an excuse to help the court avoid responsibility of its duties. If the court refuses that then it should at least make the identity of that unit known like the clerk office so the outside can know who is responsible for the actions been taken by this unite instead of looking at a totally black box.
No comments:
Post a Comment